There\u2019s stat somewhere that says by 2030, 45 percent of US women will be single and childfree.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Historically, across the human populations, approximately 80 percent of women reproduced, whereas only 40 percent of men did.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Estimates for 2020 put women at about 3.8B women, and 3.86B men, or roughly 101.7 men for every 100 women.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Even factoring for barren women (infertile, menopausal) and gay men, methinks in the world there are still more boys wanting girls than there are girls.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Thinking about that.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Now, somewheres around these parts may have mentioned being a fan of MGTOW, as methinks that\u2019s (no women\/no kids\/live life) is a great philosophy for many men.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Based on the above, it appears that MGTOW is likely not to have much of an effect. Might make guys feel good to sigma women (just learned that \u2026 see, I\u2019m hip<\/em>) but in the long run not really that important. <\/p>\n\n\n\n What is important \u2014 for the species, that is \u2014 is that if women start not breeding en masse, that\u2019s the whole ball game (heh, punny<\/em>)<\/p>\n\n\n\n So perhaps the idea of WWOM (Women WithOut Men) is more dangerous and subversive than previously thought \u2026 which is why we should all work to make that happen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Problem?\u00a0 Baby fevers.\u00a0 There\u2019s some chick \u2014 financially successful, solvent, aging \u2014 who decided to freeze her eggs during the pandemic because she \u201cwill never depend on a man\u201d and apparently doesn\u2019t give a rat\u2019s left testicle about what her (imagined) child would want \u2026 which is usually a good and daily father.<\/p>\n\n\n\n And that\u2019s one of the many problems of modern, post-Boom women \u2026 selfishness.\u00a0 TRIGGAH<\/em> Yah see part of a woman\u2019s job is to find a suitable father to provide and protect the offspring\/shelter the brood \u2026 if she can\u2019t even manage that, she\u2019s failed the basic first test. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Doesn\u2019t matter if a woman can do for self financially, make her money, get her own bag (see, I\u2019m hip<\/em>) \u2026 please, go do that be that own that. <\/p>\n\n\n\n But please consider what a child wants\/needs, and take a pill for that fever. Or get married. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Households led by single mothers produce more dysfunction \u2026 illegitimacy accompanies more depression, more incarceration, more illiteracy, more suicides, more rinse\/recycle\/repeat \u2026 don\u2019t disadvantage your kid just because you want one but nobody wants you.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Women need to recognize they owe a debt of responsibility to their children prior to bringing them into the world.\u00a0{Proverbs 21:3<\/em>}<\/p>\n\n\n\n And pay that debt forward.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" There\u2019s stat somewhere that says by 2030, 45 percent of US women will be single and childfree. Historically, across the human populations, approximately 80 percent of women reproduced, whereas only 40 percent of men did. Estimates for 2020 put women at about 3.8B women, and 3.86B men, or roughly 101.7 men for every 100 women.\u00a0 … <\/p>\n
If no man finds a woman worthy to be a wife (and men are easy<\/u><\/em> \u2026 food, sex, silence \/ thank you<\/em> Mr. Rock BTW Mr. Smith was wrong for the hands but I unnerstan \u2026 he married a viper<\/em>) then that woman is not qualified to be a mother.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n