Per the usual, it\u2019s all men\u2019s fault.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Yes and that includes feminism too.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The MF is feeling the repercussions of the standard man\u2019s disengagement \u2026 send the societal message that a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle, and that man will riiiiide on out.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Which isn\u2019t necessarily a bad thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Men don\u2019t particularly like women, anyway. Got \u2018im kicked out of the Garden, so there\u2019s that.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But Pandora\u2019s Box is powerful magik, and few men can withstand it (about 10 percent of the population, if the stats are right) so that will continue to be a fair and ongoing problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Unless he\u2019s into PopTarts \u2026 which solves most of his problems except the really really<\/em> big one but digress<\/p>\n\n\n\n But in retrospect, if men had been better at \u2026 menning, then women would have been satisfied with their role, and we (the collective male\/female we [and yes there are only two]) would not be in the current gender mess.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Feminism is like labor unions. Wait! Wait, hear me out (or not, but this is interesting \u2026 or not)<\/p>\n\n\n\n See, men in the days of yore were like business owners, some of whom treated their laborers with respect, others who did not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n And for those that did, labor unions were unnecessary \u2026 workers were satisfied with wages & conditions, no need for collective bargaining, work boycotts and strike calls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But the problem stems from those that did not \u2026 those who wanted to pay a pittance, maintain unsafe working conditions, generally treated the folks doing the work as a liability rather than an asset \u2026 well, hello collective bargaining, hello boycotts, hello strikes, because something has to give when the worker gives everything for so little in return.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Same with feminism. Some husbands were true heroes \u2026 consistent in the role as provider\/protector, restricted the penis to the confines of the marriage, didn\u2019t force the wife\/kids to catch hands \u2026 good dudes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n And then \u2026 there were not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n And women\/wives\/mothers had to live their lives in fundamental freefall, hoping that the man\/husband\/father kept up his end of the bargain, and taking the hits if he didn\u2019t.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Most mothers don\u2019t abandon their kids. They usually suffer right alongside them. {Genesis 21:16<\/em>}<\/p>\n\n\n\n Men, on the other hand \u2026 deadbeat dads alliterates for a reason.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Anyhoo, if men had held other men accountable then perhaps women would not have sought out feminism as a stopgap to marital misbehavior. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Men owe(d) a debt to women to be\/live\/embody the ideal. Troublesome not being able to own property or get credit or a job, while the man to whom she is betrothed is working on his jerk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n AND, and, keep in mind that men did not fight feminism in the \u201860s, coz they got free box \u2026 not required to give marriage or commitment or even a last name to women empowering themselves by laying it low and spreading it wide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Men benefitted too, I s\u2019pose that\u2019s why there wasn\u2019t much protest against MFs back in the day. Men did not inform women that they wanted to neither bride nor breed sexually-indiscriminate women, and that men still prized virtue and virginity in a wife. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Men did not convey the message to women that they could choose vanity (i.e., independence and freedom\/promiscuity, \u00e1 la single and childless), or virtue (that is, marriage and family), and that men will not accept women who seek the former yet covet those who embrace the latter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Men did not tell women that, yes, they have a choice, and they must choose.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Now, however, standard men see the monster of the modern female, and shudder. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Men consistently claim that chivalry is dead, and women killed it. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Same same for them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n What happened to all the traditional women?<\/em> they ask.<\/p>\n\n\n\n You did, sir. You did. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Per the usual, it\u2019s all men\u2019s fault. Yes and that includes feminism too. The MF is feeling the repercussions of the standard man\u2019s disengagement \u2026 send the societal message that a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle, and that man will riiiiide on out. Which isn\u2019t necessarily a bad thing. Men … <\/p>\n
When he failed to pay that debt, she defaulted as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Sex without obligation or reproductive risk? Men stood in line for that. Twice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n