I\/we\/us thus may have mentioned it before but the manosphere is some self-delusional, masturbatory, echo chamber nonsense.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Not so much all of it, but most of it \u2026 the essence of it \u2026 its raison d’\u00eatre \u2026 is meta-stupid. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Women (and all their delicious bits) are the point.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Men might not like to acknowledge this, but 28 Days Later had it right \u2026
\u2026 \u201cI promised them women.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Women civilize men, provide men with the very purpose for existence. {Gen. 2:18-25<\/em>} So there.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If not for women, men would be living in caves, picking fleas, and fighting to the death on Tuesdays.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Men tamed the world to ease access to women \u2026 can\u2019t keep a woman in the mood if she\u2019s worried about predators. Men created grocery stores so women could gather the necessary food supplies in one place and not risk having her being carried off into the wilderness. Men made laundry machines so women wouldn\u2019t get eaten by bears down by the river as they beat the pelts on rocks. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Get serious.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Honest question: How many guys will divorce a hot wife? A trashcan, sure \u2013 kick it loose \/ set it free \u2013 but beautiful, and faithful? She can be an expensive idiot & he\u2019ll hang strong \u2026 most guys will tolerate the white noise of a quarrelsome woman if he remains physically attracted to her.<\/p>\n\n\n\n That being said, most of the manosphere \u2013 the Red Pill \/ Incel \u2013 still seek women, and the entire frustration manifest by the movement is a reflection of men\u2019s desire for, drive to, and direction towards, women. <\/p>\n\n\n\n And it ain\u2019t just biology; even gay men have mothers, and a son will fight to the death for his mom (most, anyway \u2026 don\u2019t want to presume) so the \u201cfemale\u201d or \u201cfemininity\u201d or simply just \u201cwoman\u201d helps to define \u201cman,\u201d even if only to the extent that \u201cwoman\u201d helps to defines what men are not. <\/p>\n\n\n\n There is a legitimate, biological reason that women (and some men with feminine energy) gravitate towards nurturing professions \u2026 teachers, nurses, servers \u2026 because to care is to create a soft place in the world, and men need a break from all the hard surfaces they built. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Circles&Mounds \u2026 Women give men a reason to bother. <\/p>\n\n\n\n That being said, don\u2019t get married. Wives are expensive. <\/p>\n\n\n\n That being said, still need \u201cwoman\u201d tho\u2019, so \u2026 what to do, what to do \u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n Well, I like Dr. Hannibal Lecter. Great character, smart guy. Would not eat at his house, tho\u2019. He said [quoting Marcus Aurelius, another really smart guy, wouldn\u2019t eat at his house either \u2026 Rome 150 AD had poop in the streets\u2014that\u2019s why the rich were carried by slaves in curtained boxes digress<\/sup><\/sub><\/em>]<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cWhat is it in itself? What is its nature?\u201d What is woman\u2019s nature? What is woman, in herself? What is woman\u2019s nature? What is woman\u2019s reason for being? <\/p>\n\n\n\n Or is that a different question? That\u2019s a different question. <\/p>\n\n\n\n OK better yet maybe \u2026 What is man\u2019s nature? Supposedly to spread the seedlings, and to protect the environment in which those seedlings grow, mature, develop and, hopefully, leave for college. <\/p>\n\n\n\n OK so woman\u2019s nature is to \u2026 breed? Ewww, women as livestock. <\/p>\n\n\n\n No.<\/p>\n\n\n\n I know this.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The nature of man or woman is certainly not to be in debt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n Or is it? Maybe to the \u201cmasters of mankind\u201d \u2026 di-GRESS<\/p>\n\n\n\n No. TRIGGUH<\/u><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Woman\u2019s nature is to help man \u2026 spread the seedlings and protect the environment in which those seedlings grow, mature, develop and, hopefully, leave for college. TRIGGUH<\/span><\/em><\/strong> yes, non-binary gender non-specific feministric emflowerers … the purpose of woman … is to serve man.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So, back to original problem. Don\u2019t get married. Wives are expensive. Husbands are \u2026 men.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So both the sexes are a problem for each, but each sex needs the other so \u2026 what to do \u2026 what to do \u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ah! The header.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If you can\u2019t\/won\u2019t cook, there are services for that. Delivery, take-out, personal chef. All expensive, but if no wife\/no husband might be able to afford BUT do not feed the debt monkey while findwayfeedself no good \u2018cuz never got to stop eating, and will wind up constantly growing your gorilla \u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n It sounds fairly straightforward, but human beings are disgusting, and evidence of the vile beast that is we sits as residue \u2026 tucked inside cracks around every part of the home and person. <\/p>\n\n\n\n We are covered in invisible bugs that, right now, are eating our dead flesh. Just imagine what is in your hair \u2026 probably shouldn\u2019t<\/p>\n\n\n\n So that being said, must clean thehouse. If no spousal support to attend to that particular task \u2026 great news \u2026 maid services are awesome, the really good ones are thorough, and all of them help humans to live with themselves. Again, pricey, and again, no spouse \u2013 cheaper life<\/p>\n\n\n\n Finally. The SexyTimes. That Magic Moist. That Richard Flint. That ultimate Ooo. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Nevada. Or, if local, find a special someone at reasonable hourly rates (~STILL CHEAPER THAN A WIFE!~) and exercise that biological frustration. <\/p>\n\n\n\n And for the ladies \u2026 Heidi Fleiss should move forward with opening a stud farm for women \u2026 guys would probably pay to work there … spend some dedicated time with Richard, no attachments \u2026 In the meantime, swipe right?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Children? HAHAHAHAHAHHAno. <\/p>\n\n\n\n For them, not for you.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" I\/we\/us thus may have mentioned it before but the manosphere is some self-delusional, masturbatory, echo chamber nonsense. Not so much all of it, but most of it \u2026 the essence of it \u2026 its raison d’\u00eatre \u2026 is meta-stupid. Women (and all their delicious bits) are the point. Men might not like to acknowledge this, but … <\/p>\n
Hands&Holes \u2026
Boobies&Biscuits<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Itself sounds rude but methinks more accurate so TRIGGUH<\/u><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n