Amy Schumer\u2019s less-attractive sister, one of the puppets for the mankind masters\u2019 media cabal, had an opinion she thought wise to share. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
This broad was \u2026 \u201cconcerned about the unfortunately common <\/u><\/strong>office<\/u><\/em> <\/span><\/u>worker<\/strong> who wants to continue working at home\u201d \u2026 [human translation<\/em>: because the average laborer prefers to labor at the labor hired to labor from home rather than engage in the labor in the midst of office nonsense] after the pandemic … this broad believes that those remote workers \u2013 who, one is thusly reminded, are working from home to complete the work hired to do<\/em> \u2013 cannot participate in \/ wait, get this \/ \u201coffice life\u201d and [insert whine]<\/strong><\/em><\/sub><\/sup> \u201cassociated activities like helping a colleague, mentoring more junior people, celebrating someone\u2019s birthday<\/span> \u2026 Things. That. Drive. Office. Culture.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n Guess what, sweetheart\u2014Newsflash. <\/p>\n\n\n\n You know what drives office culture? <\/p>\n\n\n\n Money. <\/p>\n\n\n\n I think I\u2019m going to help this chick out. She seems desperately seeking a clue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Everyone works at the company this woman works for because the company gives those workers a check in exchange. No one \/ hear this without stutter \/ No one would do the job \u2013 the job the employer needs done<\/em> \u2013 for free. <\/p>\n\n\n\n And another thing … all those little ditties she listed as “driving office culture<\/em>” …? Got a fix for each of those, too … And I love this \u2013 she totally revealed herself, laid bare all her mindsets and motivations. {Eph. 6:12<\/em>} The fact that this broad made a public statement proves she\u2019s a puppet \u2026 the real masters of mankind don\u2019t give interviews.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Thus, because, thereof, according to her, a company could be justified in switching the status of an employee who works remote to that of an independent contractor. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Re the employee v. contractor thing \u2026 there\u2019s some official, authoritative opinions on that {Deut. 24:14-15<\/em>} \u2026 basically, contractors are one-night stands (I believe the correct vernacular is \u201cbooty call\u201d) whereas employer\/ees are married … no anticipated end date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n See, companies like independent contractors for the same reason most people like booty calls \u2026 no commitments, few rules, performance-based, call if needed. Employees are that \u2026 enblubbered wife \u2026 that husband flattening out on the couch \u2026 performance-indifference, lots and lots and lots of rules, perpetually in-house \u2026 huge hassle to dismiss. <\/p>\n\n\n\n And in some cases \u2013 depending on the hostility of the employment marriage \u2013 the spouse can wind up with half the company. Booty calls generally don’t do that. <\/p>\n\n\n\n And another thing \u2026 another couple of fratbros that owned another web-based hustle company shut down political speech at this web-based hustle company because the political speech of the employees working at the web-based hustle company criticized the behavior\/actions\/policies of the fratbros as the owners\/head fratbros of the web-based hustle company. So there\u2019s that.<\/p>\n\n\n\n AND and some chick who used to be somebody in BigTech complained about the fratbro culture of BigTech, and how some fratbro employees would refuse to report to a woman as their direct boss \u2026 and the owners\/head fratbros of the company let that pass because they are \u2026 the owners\/head fratbros of the company. <\/p>\n\n\n\n HaHA.\u00a0 Forceful reminder?\u00a0 Employee (even 6-figure) = Peasant.\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n\n\n Depending on the terms of serfdom \/ the enslavement fine print a modified prima nocte<\/em> might apply too \u2026 I have actually heard of that happening<\/em> moving on<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mr. Buffett said it best: “If you work for a living, you will work until you die.<\/em>” How sad is that. Masters of mankind, indeed … <\/p>\n\n\n\n Remember way back in the dim dark early days of the Internet \u2026 before a certain search engine conquered the spaces all the spaces with an algorithm, onomatopoeia, and a fun memey catchphrase \u2026 I recall something about it not being \u2026 evil. <\/p>\n\n\n\n What ever happened to that ad? Or even the mentality that initially supported it? Ohthat\u2019srightmoneyallthe<\/em>money = mischief<\/p>\n\n\n\n It didn\u2019t happen that\u2019s what happened because that happened, too.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Guess what. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Full circle. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Employee = Labor \/ I don\u2019t have a pitchfork (no hay on grounds) but I do have an electric chainsaw \u2026 will that do?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Amy Schumer\u2019s less-attractive sister, one of the puppets for the mankind masters\u2019 media cabal, had an opinion she thought wise to share. This broad was \u2026 \u201cconcerned about the unfortunately common office worker who wants to continue working at home\u201d \u2026 [human translation: because the average laborer prefers to labor at the labor hired to … <\/p>\n
– helping a colleague<\/span> \/ email & telephones work just about everywhere
– mentoring<\/span> \/ that’s justification for the pay differential, right? Management is expected to guide the herds’ young
– office festivities<\/span>, such as birthdays, baby showers, retirements, etc. … Nope – don’t work at Friday’s, don’t wear “flair.” <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Not<\/em> working for a living is the goal, objective, and purpose for life. No WONDER … now it all makes sense. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Employee = Peasant
\/ Employee = Debt<\/p>\n\n\n\n