There\u2019s another manosphere guru Kevin Samuels who is, shall we say, brutal \u2026 in his assessment of the problems between men and women. Essentially, he\u2019s fairly fair in his critique of both sexes, but he is lying to the women.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
See earlier. Men are looking for women to make the edges softer. Soft and moist. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
The manosphere has a pretty constant theme that the world was made by men for men to protect all that is important to men \u2013 which is true \u2013 but because men have fixed the world in such a way that women no longer need them \u2026 women should take advantage. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Again, see earlier. \u00c1 la, dual track. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Rather than deciding on college and career, girls should be educated with a mind to choose marriage or<\/em> career, rather than plan for both, and then be encouraged to direct efforts in that direction. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Doing both? Current theories in neuroscience suggest that multitasking is actually not possible, that the human brain does not actually work that way. Rather, the brain switches gears from one task to the next so quickly that we don\u2019t even notice and again GOD<\/u><\/em><\/strong> has HOOKED US UP and we DON\u2019T EVEN HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT JUST DO IT (not a slogan an encouragement) so little girls should be encouraged to be astronauts and brain surgeons and auto mechanics and wives\/moms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n And each path afforded the same respect. <\/p>\n\n\n\n If she wants to be an astronaut \u2013 STEM from the start. <\/p>\n\n\n\n If she wants to be a doctor \u2013 she gets academic credit for volunteering at a hospital or local clinic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If she wants to be a mechanic \u2013 her parents gift her some power tools and an air compressor for her sweet 16. <\/p>\n\n\n\n And if she wants to be wife\/mother (yesBOTH or at least first) the system should offer a graduate degree \u2026 Kevin Samuels has three criteria for a marriageable woman \u2013 Fit, Beautiful & Inspirational \u2013 along with a whole plethora of added requirements \u2026 cooking, cleaning, sexytimes (note: this woman in Vegas gave a class for BJs \/ new friend said saw it on cable), keeping fit, light bookkeeping \u2026 an executive secretary \/ sex kitten<\/p>\n\n\n\n Guess what.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Men who want to be husbands would be guaranteed an actual wife instead of a hot chick in a bar who pretended until she got the ring and then turned into \u2026 so not, anymore.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Is that sexist?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Of course it is. So\u2019s biology moving on<\/p>\n\n\n\n Women can perform one function wholly outside the realm of possibilities for men BTW TRIGGUH<\/em><\/strong> a transgender person who identifies as male is not a man but a transgender person who identifies as male, and that transgender person has the capacity to birth until that transgender person elects to have that capacity removed, \u00e0 la elective hysterectomy. <\/p>\n\n\n\n See, the parts were there.\u00a0 The mind can be crazy but the body ALWAYS makes sense.\u00a0 Go figure<\/p>\n\n\n\n I identify as a garden gnome. Respect my truth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Newsflash, sweetheart TRIGGUH<\/em><\/strong> \u2014 I don\u2019t have to respect your truth if it\u2019s a lie. So there.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sad\/horrifying story \u2013 years ago, in another place, in another time, I\/we\/us had to pay a traffic ticket at the courthouse, this selfsame courthouse where at an adjacent window a person asked how long it would take to \u2026 edit the gender on the person\u2019s driver\u2019s license because (and I was totally ear-hustling here) \u201cMy fianc\u00e9e doesn\u2019t know I was born a boy.\u201d\u00a0 [giggle] I present to you — Exhibit A<\/p>\n\n\n\n Point being: modern male\/female\/other relationships are generally dysfunctional. <\/p>\n\n\n\n If the roles are clear and the expectations are plain, the level of dysfunction would likely \u2026 adjust to another problem but at least the traditional male\/female gender roles would be clearly defined. <\/p>\n\n\n\n And others sh\/would work out the various sexual identity crises alone and in therapy and with prayer {1 Tim. 1:9-10<\/em>}, and never, ever in a relationship you will be fine<\/em> alone learn to be better at being you <\/strong><\/sub><\/sup>moving on<\/p>\n\n\n\n And that seems to be the problem. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Most men \u2013 methinks \u2013 want traditional women, and most women \u2013 meheard \u2013 claim to want traditional men, but those selfsame women refuse to submit\/surrender to a man\u2019s authority, because she is just as much of a provider as he is. Hmmm, sounds like a personal problem. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Women who elect to be wives\/mothers v. women who choose careers would be on entirely different trajectories, and each\/every party would (assumedly) know what to expect. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Men who married a career-woman would not look to her for a meal or a brood; if she wanted to go that route: bonus! But no expectation. That relationship would be a partnership.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A true marriage is a totalitarian dictatorship with a benevolent and wise ruler. And it aint\u2019 her. TRIGGUH<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" There\u2019s another manosphere guru Kevin Samuels who is, shall we say, brutal \u2026 in his assessment of the problems between men and women. Essentially, he\u2019s fairly fair in his critique of both sexes, but he is lying to the women. See earlier. Men are looking for women to make the edges softer. Soft and moist. … <\/p>\n