Found a great documentary on the Tubes of You \u2026 \u201cThe Red Pill,\u201d with a woman (self-described feminist) as documentarian. Excellent job, BTW.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Al Pacino is old enough to be dead at this point, but in the 70\u2019s\/80\u2019s (that\u2019s 1900s for You young whippersnappers \u2013 and what is a \u201cwhippersnapper,\u201d exactly?\u00a0 Don\u2019t mean to offend but maybe do<\/sub><\/sup>) he was the total man \u2026 all The Godfathers, Serpico, And Justice For All (\u201cYou\u2019re out of order!\u00a0 You\u2019re out of order!\u00a0 The whole trial is out of order!\u201d<\/em>), and don\u2019t not let\u2019s never forget Scarface (\u201cAh\u2019m not goan kill you, Frank \u2026 Manny \u2013 shoot this POS.\u201d<\/em>)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Frank Serpico was a real cop during the really (really?!) corrupt times of the NYPD \u2026 graft, planted\/suppressed evidence, cops dealing drugs \u2026 kinda like LA\/Oakland\/everywhere now, but with more grit, less style. Anyhoo \u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n Serpico went undercover to expose all the criminality in the police force and got shot in the face for his troubles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Real guy, real gunshot (shivers) but he received a NYPD pension that was quite lovely, from what methinks heard.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The real crime? Some trashcan tricked him into getting her pregnant, and she got 90-percent of his cop pension \u2026 for getting shot in the face and exposing corruption.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The court was full-aware of her actions bcoz she bragged to a friend about it, and that friend (true friend, there) testified in court that the trashcan said she was going to do it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n And the trashcan still got paid. For having a baby by\/with\/on a man who didn\u2019t want her or it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n [shivers]<\/p>\n\n\n\n Heard about a case in New York (Jersey? no matter same place) where this guy gets served with a demand for child support, claims kid can\u2019t be his bcoz he and the trashcan only had an \u2026 oral relationship (her on him, he didn\u2019t reciprocate [which is prolly why he got sued]) \u2026 and there is no way he could have impregnated the trashcan in that manner. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Paternity test comes back, and Maury said: You ARE the father<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Trashcan said in court filings that the guy was telling the truth \u2026 they never engaged in traditionally unlicensed whoobangin\u2019 but she saved his \u2026 dumpster juice after he left it in her mouth then impregnated herself with it. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Eeeeeeewwwwwwwuuuuuhhhh. Nasty trashcan savored and saved the dumpster juice \u2026 anyway.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Guy now on the hook for like $8K\/mo (doctor person) in child support for a kid he didn\u2019t want, wasn\u2019t aware of, and didn\u2019t even deposit in an act that would result in a pregnancy. <\/p>\n\n\n\n So he files a civil suit against the trashcan. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Theft, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Why is paternity fraud not a thing? Digress<\/p>\n\n\n\n Court says the trashcan didn\u2019t really steal his dumpster juice bcoz, technically, by leaving it in her mouth he gave it to her.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Eeeeeeewwwwwwwuuuuuhhhh. Nasty trashcan savored and saved the dumpster juice \u2026 continuing \u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n So the civil action for theft is gone. BUT but the court did allow the emotional distress claim to go forward bcoz no rational person would believe his actions would result in a pregnancy\/child. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Dunno what happened after that. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Related, sort of \u2026 not necessarily a fan, but methinks his message was \u2026 interesting. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Guy by the name of Andrew Tate got banned from popular social media.\u00a0 Not sure why, but it is definitely a thing.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n He has been compared to Nazis, the KKK, and ISIS for \u2026 encouraging? men to be traditionally hyper-masculine, like primordial, evolutionary throwback caveman, and suggests that the soft man of the current age needs to outsource masculinity when faced with true aggression (male Karens [Carls?] call the cops rather than \u201cman up\u201d and handle the threat \u2026 interesting].<\/p>\n\n\n\n Cancel culture cancels culture \u2026 how poetic. <\/p>\n\n\n\n And he is (was) a part of culture \u2026 the Manosphere, which is a part of modern culture, as distasteful as some might find it.\u00a0 Tate\u2019s Hustler University purportedly taught men how to \u2026 groom young women to be better \u2026 what, sex objects?\u00a0 Probably.\u00a0 But \u2013 as discussed back in the \u201890\u2019s (that\u2019s 1900s for You young whippersnappers \u2013 see above) a former feminist (an old dude, BTW) by the name of Warren Farrell, Ph.D. wrote a book called, \u201cThe Myth of Male Power,\u201d and discussed how men are \u201csuccess objects,\u201d and valued solely by what they can provide as opposed to who they are as people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Controversial, methinks I know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The real sorry aspect of all this is that the serious question of the attraction with this issue is never asked \u2026 why are untold numbers of men (young\/old\/in-between) flocking to the likes of Andrew Tate, of Kevin Samuels (RIP), of Jordan Peterson, of Donald Trump?\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n All are examples of strong men, when the world has a serious dearth of them, when the world is telling men that it is not OK to be men, that they need to be more like women, when a woman is undefined \/ is whatever the person is that claims to be one \u2026 is.<\/p>\n\n\n\n And the world \u2013 men and women alike \u2013 owe a debt of gratitude to men for building the world we all live in, with its problems and shortcomings and issues, still way way way better than pooping outside, hunting meat that can fight back, foraging for berries and walking 20 miles both ways uphill to get water.<\/p>\n\n\n\n I\u2019ll take today, thank you. It ain\u2019t all bad news.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But because we live not in the Information Age but rather the Misinformation Age, where truth is subjective and facts are offensive and exclusionary, young men seek the stolidity of aggressively, assertively male examples. <\/p>\n\n\n\n At this point it should be obvious that the hysterical inclusionary feminazi liberal wokespeech is not working.\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n\n\n Transgenders seek to appropriate the identity of others because claiming their own is uncomfortable, and uncertain, and undefined, because they truly do not know who\/what they are. \u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Homosexuality stridently declares itself to be a norm because it most assuredly is not.\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n\n\n Women demand rights without responsibility \u2013 her body, her choice \/ his wallet, his rules.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n The knowledge of truth is scary, so the world seeks to deny the fact of it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Matt Walsh\u2019s \u201cWhat Is a Woman?\u201d asks a great question that should have a simple answer. <\/p>\n\n\n\n For the cheap seats: A woman is a biological female who has matured to adulthood. <\/p>\n\n\n\n See? Easy peasy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A man is not a woman. Born with a dick? Not a chick. But relating a factual truth is transphobic. We got problems. But wonderfully and everlastingly, HE is the solution.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Found a great documentary on the Tubes of You \u2026 \u201cThe Red Pill,\u201d with a woman (self-described feminist) as documentarian. Excellent job, BTW. Al Pacino is old enough to be dead at this point, but in the 70\u2019s\/80\u2019s (that\u2019s 1900s for You young whippersnappers \u2013 and what is a \u201cwhippersnapper,\u201d exactly?\u00a0 Don\u2019t mean to offend … <\/p>\n
{2 Timothy 3:1-7<\/em>}<\/p>\n\n\n\n