There’s another manosphere guru Kevin Samuels who is, shall we say, brutal … in his assessment of the problems between men and women. Essentially, he’s fairly fair in his critique of both sexes, but he is lying to the women.
See earlier. Men are looking for women to make the edges softer. Soft and moist.
The manosphere has a pretty constant theme that the world was made by men for men to protect all that is important to men – which is true – but because men have fixed the world in such a way that women no longer need them … women should take advantage.
Again, see earlier. Á la, dual track.
Rather than deciding on college and career, girls should be educated with a mind to choose marriage or career, rather than plan for both, and then be encouraged to direct efforts in that direction.
Doing both? Current theories in neuroscience suggest that multitasking is actually not possible, that the human brain does not actually work that way. Rather, the brain switches gears from one task to the next so quickly that we don’t even notice and again GOD has HOOKED US UP and we DON’T EVEN HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT JUST DO IT (not a slogan an encouragement) so little girls should be encouraged to be astronauts and brain surgeons and auto mechanics and wives/moms.
And each path afforded the same respect.
If she wants to be an astronaut – STEM from the start.
If she wants to be a doctor – she gets academic credit for volunteering at a hospital or local clinic.
If she wants to be a mechanic – her parents gift her some power tools and an air compressor for her sweet 16.
And if she wants to be wife/mother (yesBOTH or at least first) the system should offer a graduate degree … Kevin Samuels has three criteria for a marriageable woman – Fit, Beautiful & Inspirational – along with a whole plethora of added requirements … cooking, cleaning, sexytimes (note: this woman in Vegas gave a class for BJs / new friend said saw it on cable), keeping fit, light bookkeeping … an executive secretary / sex kitten
Guess what.
Men who want to be husbands would be guaranteed an actual wife instead of a hot chick in a bar who pretended until she got the ring and then turned into … so not, anymore.
Is that sexist?
Of course it is. So’s biology moving on
Women can perform one function wholly outside the realm of possibilities for men BTW TRIGGUH a transgender person who identifies as male is not a man but a transgender person who identifies as male, and that transgender person has the capacity to birth until that transgender person elects to have that capacity removed, à la elective hysterectomy.
See, the parts were there. The mind can be crazy but the body ALWAYS makes sense. Go figure
I identify as a garden gnome. Respect my truth.
Newsflash, sweetheart TRIGGUH — I don’t have to respect your truth if it’s a lie. So there.
Sad/horrifying story – years ago, in another place, in another time, I/we/us had to pay a traffic ticket at the courthouse, this selfsame courthouse where at an adjacent window a person asked how long it would take to … edit the gender on the person’s driver’s license because (and I was totally ear-hustling here) “My fiancée doesn’t know I was born a boy.” [giggle] I present to you — Exhibit A
Point being: modern male/female/other relationships are generally dysfunctional.
If the roles are clear and the expectations are plain, the level of dysfunction would likely … adjust to another problem but at least the traditional male/female gender roles would be clearly defined.
And others sh/would work out the various sexual identity crises alone and in therapy and with prayer {1 Tim. 1:9-10}, and never, ever in a relationship you will be fine alone learn to be better at being you moving on
And that seems to be the problem.
Most men – methinks – want traditional women, and most women – meheard – claim to want traditional men, but those selfsame women refuse to submit/surrender to a man’s authority, because she is just as much of a provider as he is. Hmmm, sounds like a personal problem.
Women who elect to be wives/mothers v. women who choose careers would be on entirely different trajectories, and each/every party would (assumedly) know what to expect.
Men who married a career-woman would not look to her for a meal or a brood; if she wanted to go that route: bonus! But no expectation. That relationship would be a partnership.
A true marriage is a totalitarian dictatorship with a benevolent and wise ruler. And it aint’ her. TRIGGUH